Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="fepago" data-source="post: 1048860" data-attributes="member: 13568">la eficacia del 127mm con espoleta VT(proximidad), mas los directores mark 51 capaces de a traves del swichtboard de concentrar la artilleria de 127mm , 40mm (y hasta los 28mm en unidades&nbsp; viejas) en un solo blanco apuntando con una mira predictora giroestabilizada mark-14&nbsp; fueron una de las causas de la adopcion de la tactica kamikaze. estimaban que nada sobreviviria a esa barrera. la otra y casi nunca nombrada la mala calidad y escases del combustible japones (mas con la aeronafta de pino!!) solo cargas para el vieje de ida.Los directores mk-51 estaban en el CRUBE en una version con radar llamada mark-57:You could have 40 mm's and 5&quot;/38's connected to the same Mark 51 director at the same time and fire both, if you wanted to.&nbsp; Or any other configuration you had.At just about the close of the war, a new director, the Mark 57 GFCS, was introduced which was used to augment the Mark 51.&nbsp; These were similar to the Mark 51 but they now included a Mark 34 radar, radar scope and a Mark 17 computer.&nbsp; This new FCS gave accurate ranging and added a radar operator to the system.&nbsp; These systems gave blind-fire capability to the 40 mm mounts.&nbsp; There were about one Mark 57 added for every four Mark 51 directors.The Mark 57 was manually operated with a set of handle bars with triggers similar to the Mark 51.&nbsp; The operator could track the target either with the optical gun sight or on the radar scope.&nbsp; The computer, using two rate-of-turn gyros and a cross-roll gyro, transmitted target data to the computer below deck which then calculted the target problem and sent the gun train and elevation data to the mount or mounts under control.para el tema que estamos hablando , la capacidad de concentrar todos o varias piezas de 40 mm en un blanco no debe ser despreciada. no vi en fotos eso si que las piezas de 40 y 20 mm tuvieran las mark 14 montadas solo miras de parrilla.saludos.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fepago, post: 1048860, member: 13568"] la eficacia del 127mm con espoleta VT(proximidad), mas los directores mark 51 capaces de a traves del swichtboard de concentrar la artilleria de 127mm , 40mm (y hasta los 28mm en unidades viejas) en un solo blanco apuntando con una mira predictora giroestabilizada mark-14 fueron una de las causas de la adopcion de la tactica kamikaze. estimaban que nada sobreviviria a esa barrera. la otra y casi nunca nombrada la mala calidad y escases del combustible japones (mas con la aeronafta de pino!!) solo cargas para el vieje de ida. Los directores mk-51 estaban en el CRUBE en una version con radar llamada mark-57: You could have 40 mm's and 5"/38's connected to the same Mark 51 director at the same time and fire both, if you wanted to. Or any other configuration you had. At just about the close of the war, a new director, the Mark 57 GFCS, was introduced which was used to augment the Mark 51. These were similar to the Mark 51 but they now included a Mark 34 radar, radar scope and a Mark 17 computer. This new FCS gave accurate ranging and added a radar operator to the system. These systems gave blind-fire capability to the 40 mm mounts. There were about one Mark 57 added for every four Mark 51 directors. The Mark 57 was manually operated with a set of handle bars with triggers similar to the Mark 51. The operator could track the target either with the optical gun sight or on the radar scope. The computer, using two rate-of-turn gyros and a cross-roll gyro, transmitted target data to the computer below deck which then calculted the target problem and sent the gun train and elevation data to the mount or mounts under control. para el tema que estamos hablando , la capacidad de concentrar todos o varias piezas de 40 mm en un blanco no debe ser despreciada. no vi en fotos eso si que las piezas de 40 y 20 mm tuvieran las mark 14 montadas solo miras de parrilla. saludos. [/QUOTE]

Verificación

Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982