Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Navales
Futuro de las Fuerzas Navales
¿Qué barco/s necesita la ARA?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="SuperEtendard" data-source="post: 1644520" data-attributes="member: 128"><p>Igual yo no tendría problemas en adquirir torpedos Type 65-DST92 para operaciones ASuW.</p><p></p><p>The <a href="http://news.usni.org/2013/06/20/navy-develops-torpedo-killing-torpedo">US Naval Institute News is reporting</a> that the Navy is developing a small torpedo to intercept Russian/Soviet designed torpedoes that are immune to normal acoustic torpedo countermeasures, because they follow the target’s wake rather than passively homing on the ship’s noise. I would expect it to work against other types of torpedoes as well.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://chuckhillscgblog.net/2013/06/20/navy-developing-small-anti-torpedo-torpedo-system-possible-cg-use/">http://chuckhillscgblog.net/2013/06/20/navy-developing-small-anti-torpedo-torpedo-system-possible-cg-use/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>At the height of the Cold War in the mid-1980s – as a modern, quieter, and expanded Soviet submarine force seemed ready to challenge the U.S. Navy, anytime, anywhere – concerns spiked when intelligence indicated that the Soviets had developed a new type of long-range torpedo that homed on the wake of surface ships. Existing countermeasures were of no value, and Navy science and technology mavens struggled to find an answer. The “wake-homer” torpedo threat was so severe that then-Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Surface Warfare (OP-03), Vice Adm. Joseph Metcalf declared the only counter to it was to “...position a frigate astern of every high-value unit.” The response of the frigate community to Metcalf’s “solution” was quick and vocal.</p><p></p><p>For example, information on the 50-knot Soviet Type 65 wake-homing torpedo, what naval strategist Norman Polmar, writing in the December 1989 U.S. Naval Institute <em>Proceedings</em>, called the “largest and most lethal non-nuclear torpedo in existence,”</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_32/antitorpedo.html">http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_32/antitorpedo.html</a></p><p></p><p>Saludos</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SuperEtendard, post: 1644520, member: 128"] Igual yo no tendría problemas en adquirir torpedos Type 65-DST92 para operaciones ASuW. The [URL='http://news.usni.org/2013/06/20/navy-develops-torpedo-killing-torpedo']US Naval Institute News is reporting[/URL] that the Navy is developing a small torpedo to intercept Russian/Soviet designed torpedoes that are immune to normal acoustic torpedo countermeasures, because they follow the target’s wake rather than passively homing on the ship’s noise. I would expect it to work against other types of torpedoes as well. [url]http://chuckhillscgblog.net/2013/06/20/navy-developing-small-anti-torpedo-torpedo-system-possible-cg-use/[/url] At the height of the Cold War in the mid-1980s – as a modern, quieter, and expanded Soviet submarine force seemed ready to challenge the U.S. Navy, anytime, anywhere – concerns spiked when intelligence indicated that the Soviets had developed a new type of long-range torpedo that homed on the wake of surface ships. Existing countermeasures were of no value, and Navy science and technology mavens struggled to find an answer. The “wake-homer” torpedo threat was so severe that then-Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Surface Warfare (OP-03), Vice Adm. Joseph Metcalf declared the only counter to it was to “...position a frigate astern of every high-value unit.” The response of the frigate community to Metcalf’s “solution” was quick and vocal. For example, information on the 50-knot Soviet Type 65 wake-homing torpedo, what naval strategist Norman Polmar, writing in the December 1989 U.S. Naval Institute [I]Proceedings[/I], called the “largest and most lethal non-nuclear torpedo in existence,” [url]http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_32/antitorpedo.html[/url] Saludos [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
¿Cuanto es 2 mas 6? (en letras)
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Navales
Futuro de las Fuerzas Navales
¿Qué barco/s necesita la ARA?
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba
