Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Aéreas
Futuro de las Fuerzas Aéreas
¿Qué hacemos con los Pucarás?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="tanoarg" data-source="post: 1077910" data-attributes="member: 569"><p>no es mentira...es sacado de contexto. fijate que te deje el link original...y fijate lo que dice respecto a por que no se uso despues del 1º de febrero.</p><p></p><p>TLAM launches occurred overwhelmingly in the first 3 days of the war. Of</p><p>the 260 TLAM Cs and D-Is that transitioned to cruise phase, more than</p><p>39 percent were fired in the first 24 hours; 62 percent were launched</p><p>during the first 48 hours; just over 73 percent in the first 72 hours; and no</p><p>TLAMs of any kind were launched after February 1, 1991, just 2 weeks after</p><p>the war started. CNA/DIA offered no explanation for why there were no</p><p>launches after February 1. However, CNA/DIA noted that on February 1, six</p><p>TLAM Cs were fired in a “stream raid,” all aimed at the Rasheed airfield;</p><p>they arrived in the Baghdad area about 11 a.m., they were fired upon, and</p><p>only two of the six arrived at the target. GWAPS reported that Gen.</p><p>Schwarzkopf did not approve any additional TLAM strikes either because</p><p>(1) television coverage of daylight strikes in downtown Baghdad proved</p><p>unacceptable in Washington or (2) <strong>their use was deemed too expensive</strong></p><p><strong>given its relatively small warhead and high cost.</strong></p><p><span style="color: rgb(204,204,204)"><span style="font-size: 10px">--- merged: Nov 8, 2011 3:27 PM ---</span></span></p><p>y una cosa mas...no es lo mismo un tomahawk de hace 20 años atras...que uno actual.</p><p>un abrazo</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tanoarg, post: 1077910, member: 569"] no es mentira...es sacado de contexto. fijate que te deje el link original...y fijate lo que dice respecto a por que no se uso despues del 1º de febrero. TLAM launches occurred overwhelmingly in the first 3 days of the war. Of the 260 TLAM Cs and D-Is that transitioned to cruise phase, more than 39 percent were fired in the first 24 hours; 62 percent were launched during the first 48 hours; just over 73 percent in the first 72 hours; and no TLAMs of any kind were launched after February 1, 1991, just 2 weeks after the war started. CNA/DIA offered no explanation for why there were no launches after February 1. However, CNA/DIA noted that on February 1, six TLAM Cs were fired in a “stream raid,” all aimed at the Rasheed airfield; they arrived in the Baghdad area about 11 a.m., they were fired upon, and only two of the six arrived at the target. GWAPS reported that Gen. Schwarzkopf did not approve any additional TLAM strikes either because (1) television coverage of daylight strikes in downtown Baghdad proved unacceptable in Washington or (2) [B]their use was deemed too expensive[/B] [B]given its relatively small warhead and high cost.[/B] [COLOR=rgb(204,204,204)][SIZE=2]--- merged: Nov 8, 2011 3:27 PM ---[/SIZE][/COLOR] y una cosa mas...no es lo mismo un tomahawk de hace 20 años atras...que uno actual. un abrazo [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
¿Cuanto es 2 mas 6? (en letras)
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Aéreas
Futuro de las Fuerzas Aéreas
¿Qué hacemos con los Pucarás?
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba