Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Aéreas
Noticias y Actualidad de las Fuerzas Aéreas
144 a 0: nuevos detalles del Raptor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="Derruido" data-source="post: 188075" data-attributes="member: 30"><p><strong>Yo creo que el kía tenía miedo de gastar una fortuna en un avión stealth, para que a los pocos años esa tecnología ya no fuera tal</strong>.</p><p></p><p>Beginning with the Gulf War of 1990-91, stealth aircraft such as the F-117A Nighthawk and B-2 Spirit have enjoyed incredible success against sophisticated air defence radar systems based upon netted monostatic radar systems. The use of purpose shaping, radar absorbent materials, and perhaps active cancellation RCS reduction techniques has been demonstrably successful. However, stealth is not invulnerable. In the world of military technology, “[n]o offensive advantage lasts. Often there is a relatively cheap defence counter to match new offensive technology.”[106] While passive multistatic radar systems may not be ‘cheap’, this paper has shown that they do have significantly increased chances of detecting, tracking and engaging stealthy targets. Increases in computing power are making these systems ever more easy to implement. The dominance of stealth may be ending, but in the never-ending game of measure and countermeasure, the next major advantage for the offensive will not be far off.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://wps.cfc.forces.gc.ca/papers/csc/csc29/mds/hudson.htm#_Toc40115009">http://wps.cfc.forces.gc.ca/papers/csc/csc29/mds/hudson.htm#_Toc40115009</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derruido, post: 188075, member: 30"] [B]Yo creo que el kía tenía miedo de gastar una fortuna en un avión stealth, para que a los pocos años esa tecnología ya no fuera tal[/B]. Beginning with the Gulf War of 1990-91, stealth aircraft such as the F-117A Nighthawk and B-2 Spirit have enjoyed incredible success against sophisticated air defence radar systems based upon netted monostatic radar systems. The use of purpose shaping, radar absorbent materials, and perhaps active cancellation RCS reduction techniques has been demonstrably successful. However, stealth is not invulnerable. In the world of military technology, “[n]o offensive advantage lasts. Often there is a relatively cheap defence counter to match new offensive technology.”[106] While passive multistatic radar systems may not be ‘cheap’, this paper has shown that they do have significantly increased chances of detecting, tracking and engaging stealthy targets. Increases in computing power are making these systems ever more easy to implement. The dominance of stealth may be ending, but in the never-ending game of measure and countermeasure, the next major advantage for the offensive will not be far off. [url]http://wps.cfc.forces.gc.ca/papers/csc/csc29/mds/hudson.htm#_Toc40115009[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Aéreas
Noticias y Actualidad de las Fuerzas Aéreas
144 a 0: nuevos detalles del Raptor
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba