Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="Me 109" data-source="post: 1545604">Interesante relato que hace un pasajero de Swiss acerca de la información que contiene la revista de abordo de la empresa suiza, hace un comparativo de la eficiencia en el consumo de combustibles.-Hay un dato que me llama la atención: la introducción del 777 implicaría ahorros de más del 20% de combustible comparado con el 343 (el que usa ARSA).-Y un forista me trató de infantil por pedir el 777 para ARSA...en fin...&quot;Recently I was flying with SWISS and a stumbled over an article in their board magazine about fuel savings, when introducing new aircraft types.A short summary:- &quot;Replacing the 332 with the 333 increased the fuel efficiency by 13%&quot; (so this have to be the savings per seat-mile)- &quot;The introduction of the 777 will generate savings of more than 20% compared to the A340&quot;- &quot;The deployment of the new Bombardier CSeries will bring an improvement of more than 25% compared to its predecessor&quot; (Fokker 100?)I think these are very interesting numbers direct from an airline, which should be discussed and it raises some questions why some airlines like OS still using so many Fokker 100? Has SWISS very special flight profiles, so that they can gain so much on fuel savings?Are there other examples or studies, with (more or less) exact numbers of the increase in fuel efficiency of new introduced aircraft (historical and current examples)?At the end some more interesting figures from SWISS:Fuel per 100 km seat miles in 2002: 4.52 litres (52 miles / US gallon)Fuel per 100 km seat miles in 2012: 3.64 litres (64 miles / US gallon)link a la fuente: <a href="http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/6055791/">http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/6055791/</a>Tiene algunos errores: el CSeries reemplazará AVRO RJ, no Fokker 100</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Me 109, post: 1545604"] Interesante relato que hace un pasajero de Swiss acerca de la información que contiene la revista de abordo de la empresa suiza, hace un comparativo de la eficiencia en el consumo de combustibles.- Hay un dato que me llama la atención: la introducción del 777 implicaría ahorros de más del 20% de combustible comparado con el 343 (el que usa ARSA).- Y un forista me trató de infantil por pedir el 777 para ARSA...en fin... "Recently I was flying with SWISS and a stumbled over an article in their board magazine about fuel savings, when introducing new aircraft types. A short summary: - "Replacing the 332 with the 333 increased the fuel efficiency by 13%" (so this have to be the savings per seat-mile) - "The introduction of the 777 will generate savings of more than 20% compared to the A340" - "The deployment of the new Bombardier CSeries will bring an improvement of more than 25% compared to its predecessor" (Fokker 100?) I think these are very interesting numbers direct from an airline, which should be discussed and it raises some questions why some airlines like OS still using so many Fokker 100? Has SWISS very special flight profiles, so that they can gain so much on fuel savings? Are there other examples or studies, with (more or less) exact numbers of the increase in fuel efficiency of new introduced aircraft (historical and current examples)? At the end some more interesting figures from SWISS: Fuel per 100 km seat miles in 2002: 4.52 litres (52 miles / US gallon) Fuel per 100 km seat miles in 2012: 3.64 litres (64 miles / US gallon) link a la fuente: [url]http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/6055791/[/url] Tiene algunos errores: el CSeries reemplazará AVRO RJ, no Fokker 100 [/QUOTE]

Verificación

Libertador de Argentina