Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Terrestres
Tecnologías, Tácticas y Sistemas Terrestres
Chalecos Antibalas
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="BorisD" data-source="post: 1074175" data-attributes="member: 13557"><p><strong>Dragon Skin vs Interceptor y otros</strong></p><p></p><p>Hace mucho que me pregunto que pasó con la pugna entre Pinaccle y muchos defensores del DS y el USArmy. El Ejército prefirió el "antiguo" (pur su tecnología) Interceptor, ahora mejorado o upgradeado al IOTV antes que el publicitado Dragon Skin. Ahora cuesta encontrar alguna fuente confiable u objetiva que diga cual es realmente mejor.</p><p></p><p>Según Pinaccle:</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #336699">Increased Multiple Repeat Hit Capability</span></span></strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #666666">Pinnacle’s SOV/Dragon Skin® technology can sustain greater amounts of impacts than current monolithic ceramic plate technologies affording increased soldier survivability.</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #336699">Less Trauma (Backface Deformation Signature)</span></span></strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #666666">Pinnacle’s SOV/Dragon Skin® technology has demonstrated 45-52% reduction in average back face deformation reduced trauma to the body. This means the wearer can take multiple hits on the vest and keep fighting effectively. This aspect, by itself, is incredibly important, especially in urban warfare and CQB (Close Quarters Battle) scenarios.</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: #336699">Reduced Ricochet Threat</span></strong></p><p></p><p>The SOV/Dragon Skin® technology has shown to eliminate ricochets’ from obliquity/angled shots up to 60°. The rigid plates have ricochet shots starting at approximately 35°. This too increases soldier survivability by reducing the probability of one soldier being shot and the projectile ricocheting off him and into the next soldier injuring or fatally wounding him/her.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #336699">Fit Flexibility</span></span></strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #666666">The SOV/Dragon Skin® technology is tailorable for both male and females to the 97 percentile. It can be used not only in a tactical configuration but also in concealed variants for both genders.</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: #336699">Weighs Less</span></strong></p><p></p><p>Pinnacle’s Dragon Skin® technology’s (Flexible Body Armor) vest has the lightest weight for the ballistic and fragmentation protection capabilities provided. No other technology has the protection (coverage and impact capabilities) that the SOV/Dragon Skin® technology provides.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BorisD, post: 1074175, member: 13557"] [B]Dragon Skin vs Interceptor y otros[/B] Hace mucho que me pregunto que pasó con la pugna entre Pinaccle y muchos defensores del DS y el USArmy. El Ejército prefirió el "antiguo" (pur su tecnología) Interceptor, ahora mejorado o upgradeado al IOTV antes que el publicitado Dragon Skin. Ahora cuesta encontrar alguna fuente confiable u objetiva que diga cual es realmente mejor. Según Pinaccle: [B][FONT=Arial][COLOR=#336699]Increased Multiple Repeat Hit Capability[/COLOR][/FONT][/B] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#666666]Pinnacle’s SOV/Dragon Skin® technology can sustain greater amounts of impacts than current monolithic ceramic plate technologies affording increased soldier survivability.[/COLOR][/FONT] [B][FONT=Arial][COLOR=#336699]Less Trauma (Backface Deformation Signature)[/COLOR][/FONT][/B] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#666666]Pinnacle’s SOV/Dragon Skin® technology has demonstrated 45-52% reduction in average back face deformation reduced trauma to the body. This means the wearer can take multiple hits on the vest and keep fighting effectively. This aspect, by itself, is incredibly important, especially in urban warfare and CQB (Close Quarters Battle) scenarios.[/COLOR][/FONT] [B][COLOR=#336699]Reduced Ricochet Threat[/COLOR][/B] The SOV/Dragon Skin® technology has shown to eliminate ricochets’ from obliquity/angled shots up to 60°. The rigid plates have ricochet shots starting at approximately 35°. This too increases soldier survivability by reducing the probability of one soldier being shot and the projectile ricocheting off him and into the next soldier injuring or fatally wounding him/her. [B][FONT=Arial][COLOR=#336699]Fit Flexibility[/COLOR][/FONT][/B] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#666666]The SOV/Dragon Skin® technology is tailorable for both male and females to the 97 percentile. It can be used not only in a tactical configuration but also in concealed variants for both genders.[/COLOR][/FONT] [B][COLOR=#336699]Weighs Less[/COLOR][/B] Pinnacle’s Dragon Skin® technology’s (Flexible Body Armor) vest has the lightest weight for the ballistic and fragmentation protection capabilities provided. No other technology has the protection (coverage and impact capabilities) that the SOV/Dragon Skin® technology provides. [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
¿Cuanto es 2 mas 6? (en letras)
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Terrestres
Tecnologías, Tácticas y Sistemas Terrestres
Chalecos Antibalas
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba
