Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="Daniel1962" data-source="post: 1609316" data-attributes="member: 4365">Interesante lo de la nota de NYT, ese pedazo de fuselaje dice que lo encontraron 2 reporteros del diario. O sea que es distinto al fotografiado por el Financial Times ayer y que habia encontrado un poblador de la zona. ------Many of the holes are relatively small ...Mr. Foster said “most of the smaller holes appear to have been caused by a high-velocity projectile, as opposed to shearing or tearing caused by the forceful separation of the panel from the airframe.” He said the SA-11 family of missiles was designed to destroy fast-moving military aircraft at high elevations. Rather than striking an aircraft directly, the missiles intercept the targeted aircraft and then explode near it, creating a cloud of shrapnel.... and uniform in size.Most of the perforations are about the same size, and the fragments seemed to have entered from a front angle, Mr. Foster said. He said that fragmentary-warhead missiles try to “put as many consistently sized, low-drag fragments into the airframe as possible.” The shrapnel damage is different from what would be expected after an aircraft-engine explosion, Mr. Foster said, which would have caused “longer, thinner, oblique tears across the aircraft skin, with a slight hump toward the point where the fragment entered the skin, rather than the majority of punctures present.”------Pero por ahora todas las opiniones son hechas a traves de lo que se ve en las fotos. Algo más concluyente se podrá saber cuando se analizen los materiales en un laboratorio independiente, si es que se puede. Y seguimos, por ahora, con que los 3 actores directos en juego &quot;tienen la tecnologia para haberlo hecho&quot; (los SA-11).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Daniel1962, post: 1609316, member: 4365"] Interesante lo de la nota de NYT, ese pedazo de fuselaje dice que lo encontraron 2 reporteros del diario. O sea que es distinto al fotografiado por el Financial Times ayer y que habia encontrado un poblador de la zona. ------ Many of the holes are relatively small ... Mr. Foster said “most of the smaller holes appear to have been caused by a high-velocity projectile, as opposed to shearing or tearing caused by the forceful separation of the panel from the airframe.” He said the SA-11 family of missiles was designed to destroy fast-moving military aircraft at high elevations. Rather than striking an aircraft directly, the missiles intercept the targeted aircraft and then explode near it, creating a cloud of shrapnel. ... and uniform in size. Most of the perforations are about the same size, and the fragments seemed to have entered from a front angle, Mr. Foster said. He said that fragmentary-warhead missiles try to “put as many consistently sized, low-drag fragments into the airframe as possible.” The shrapnel damage is different from what would be expected after an aircraft-engine explosion, Mr. Foster said, which would have caused “longer, thinner, oblique tears across the aircraft skin, with a slight hump toward the point where the fragment entered the skin, rather than the majority of punctures present.” ------ Pero por ahora todas las opiniones son hechas a traves de lo que se ve en las fotos. Algo más concluyente se podrá saber cuando se analizen los materiales en un laboratorio independiente, si es que se puede. Y seguimos, por ahora, con que los 3 actores directos en juego "tienen la tecnologia para haberlo hecho" (los SA-11). [/QUOTE]

Verificación

Libertador de Argentina