Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="Marcantilan" data-source="post: 1500547" data-attributes="member: 5451">HL Deb 02 July 1987 vol 488 c452WA <a href="http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/1987/jul/02/Malvinas-war-nuclear-weapons-undertaking#column_452wa">452WA</a><a href="http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/1987/jul/02/Malvinas-war-nuclear-weapons-undertaking#S5LV0488P0_19870702_LWA_9">§</a> <a href="http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/people/mr-hugh-jenkins">Lord Jenkins of Putney</a>asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Polaris nuclear missiles carried by submarine and deployed in the Atlantic during the Malvinas war were targeted on Argentina and whether they were carrying thermonuclear warheads.<a href="http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/1987/jul/02/Malvinas-war-nuclear-weapons-undertaking#S5LV0488P0_19870702_LWA_10">§</a> <a href="http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/people/mr-david-trefgarne">The Minister of State for Defence Procurement (Lord Trefgarne)</a>
As the Prime Minister has stated (Vol. 65, col. 468–470) there was no change in the standard deployment patterns of our Polaris submarines during the Malvinas conflict. Moreover, the late Lord Trenchard gave the noble Lord a categorical assurance at the time that nuclear weapons would not be used in the Malvinas conflict (Vol. 429, col. 778).

Sirve? Supongo que se entiende, pregunta un Lord donde estaban los SSBN y si apuntaron a Argentina, y el gobierno británico responde que no cambiaron de estación durante el conflicto.

Claro que &quot;standard deployment patterns&quot; es muy amplio, pudieron haber venido más acá, más allá, pero no mucho. El problema seguían siendo los rusos!!!
</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marcantilan, post: 1500547, member: 5451"] HL Deb 02 July 1987 vol 488 c452WA [URL='http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/1987/jul/02/Malvinas-war-nuclear-weapons-undertaking#column_452wa']452WA[/URL] [URL='http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/1987/jul/02/Malvinas-war-nuclear-weapons-undertaking#S5LV0488P0_19870702_LWA_9']§[/URL] [URL='http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/people/mr-hugh-jenkins']Lord Jenkins of Putney[/URL] asked Her Majesty's Government: Whether the Polaris nuclear missiles carried by submarine and deployed in the Atlantic during the Malvinas war were targeted on Argentina and whether they were carrying thermonuclear warheads. [INDENT][URL='http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/1987/jul/02/Malvinas-war-nuclear-weapons-undertaking#S5LV0488P0_19870702_LWA_10']§[/URL] [URL='http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/people/mr-david-trefgarne']The Minister of State for Defence Procurement (Lord Trefgarne)[/URL] As the Prime Minister has stated (Vol. 65, col. 468–470) there was no change in the standard deployment patterns of our Polaris submarines during the Malvinas conflict. Moreover, the late Lord Trenchard gave the noble Lord a categorical assurance at the time that nuclear weapons would not be used in the Malvinas conflict (Vol. 429, col. 778). Sirve? Supongo que se entiende, pregunta un Lord donde estaban los SSBN y si apuntaron a Argentina, y el gobierno británico responde que no cambiaron de estación durante el conflicto. Claro que "standard deployment patterns" es muy amplio, pudieron haber venido más acá, más allá, pero no mucho. El problema seguían siendo los rusos!!! [/INDENT] [/QUOTE]

Verificación

¿Cuanto es 2 mas 6? (en letras)