Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Terrestres
Futuro de las Fuerzas Terrestres
El mejor Fusil para el EA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="SnAkE_OnE" data-source="post: 33021"><p>The key idea of SCAR rifle system is that it will provide the Special Forces operators with wide variety of options, from short-barreled 5.56mm SCAR-L CQC variation, tailored for urban close combat, and up to long range 7.62x51 SCAR-H Sniper variant, as well as 7.62x39 SCAR-H, which will accept "battlefield pickup" AK-47/AKM magazines with 7.62 M43 ammunition, available during the operations behind the enemy lines. Both SCAR-L and SCAR-H shall be initially available in three versions, Standard (S), Close Quarters Combat (CQC) and Sniper Variant (SV). All these variants, regardless the caliber and exact configuration, will provide the operator with the same controls layout, same handling and maintenance procedures, and same optional equipment, such as sights, scopes, and other current and future attachments.</p><p></p><p></p><p>esa es la explicacion del proposito del SCAR , aca dejo la foto con los 2 cañones , pido perdon para quien no entienda el material en ingles</p><p></p><p><img src="http://world.guns.ru/assault/scar-l_disasm.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>claramente el SCAR utiliza tanto cargadores de M-16 , FAL y AK algo que me parece por demas interesante</p><p></p><p>In all variants FN SCAR rifles feature gas operated, short stroke piston action with rotating bolt locking. Bolt system appears to be somewhat similar to that of FN Minimi / M249 SAW machine gun. This system apparently is less sensitive to fine sand, dust and any other fouling inside the receiver, than any system with M16-type multi-lug bolt and plunger-type ejector. </p><p></p><p>yo particularmente no encuentro la diferencia para los defensores del F-2000 ya que el F-2000 en configuracion limpia esta pesando unos 3.6kg y 4.6kg con el lanzador de 40mm....siempre vacio , ponele como 4 y 5kg en el caso de estar cargado...y por mas "moderno" que sea el diseño...si yo tengo que elegir entre los 2....por todos los datos me quedo con el FN SCAR , otro dato...el M-16A2 esta en el peso de 3.77kg vacio y 4.47kg cargado..., el numero de 3.77kg que se decia en otro post implica que el FAL Para tiene el mismo peso del M-16</p><p></p><p>SCAR-L and SCAR-H use similar upper receivers that differ only in the size of ejection port. Other different parts include caliber-specific bolt, barrel, and lower receiver with integral magazine housing. Parts commonality between SCAR-L and SCAR-H is astonishing 90%. Barrels are quick-detachable, and held in the upper receiver with two cross-bolts. Barrel change procedure requires minimum amount of tools, takes just several minutes and there is no need to adjust the headspace after the change.</p><p>The trigger unit with ambidextrous safety-fire mode selector switch allows for single shots and full automatic fire, with no provisions for limited-length bursts mode. The charging handle could be easily installed on either side of the weapon, so the upper receiver has respective cuts on both sides. Top of the upper receiver is covered by the full-length integral Picatinny rail (MIL-STD 1913); additional Picatinny rails are mounted on both sides and under the free-floating handguards. Side-folding polymer buttstock is adjustable for length of pull, and is shaped to proved positive cheek rest with adjustable cheek support. SCAR rifles are fitted with removable, adjustable iron sights, with folding diopter-type rear sight on the receiver rail, and folding front sight on the gas block. Any additional type of sighting equipment, necessary for current tasks, including telescope and night sights, can be installed using MIL-STD 1913 compatible mounts. </p><p></p><p>por ahora....son todos los datos que tengo a mano , asi que esta en uds analizar </p><p></p><p></p><p>saludos</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SnAkE_OnE, post: 33021"] The key idea of SCAR rifle system is that it will provide the Special Forces operators with wide variety of options, from short-barreled 5.56mm SCAR-L CQC variation, tailored for urban close combat, and up to long range 7.62x51 SCAR-H Sniper variant, as well as 7.62x39 SCAR-H, which will accept "battlefield pickup" AK-47/AKM magazines with 7.62 M43 ammunition, available during the operations behind the enemy lines. Both SCAR-L and SCAR-H shall be initially available in three versions, Standard (S), Close Quarters Combat (CQC) and Sniper Variant (SV). All these variants, regardless the caliber and exact configuration, will provide the operator with the same controls layout, same handling and maintenance procedures, and same optional equipment, such as sights, scopes, and other current and future attachments. esa es la explicacion del proposito del SCAR , aca dejo la foto con los 2 cañones , pido perdon para quien no entienda el material en ingles [IMG]http://world.guns.ru/assault/scar-l_disasm.jpg[/IMG] claramente el SCAR utiliza tanto cargadores de M-16 , FAL y AK algo que me parece por demas interesante In all variants FN SCAR rifles feature gas operated, short stroke piston action with rotating bolt locking. Bolt system appears to be somewhat similar to that of FN Minimi / M249 SAW machine gun. This system apparently is less sensitive to fine sand, dust and any other fouling inside the receiver, than any system with M16-type multi-lug bolt and plunger-type ejector. yo particularmente no encuentro la diferencia para los defensores del F-2000 ya que el F-2000 en configuracion limpia esta pesando unos 3.6kg y 4.6kg con el lanzador de 40mm....siempre vacio , ponele como 4 y 5kg en el caso de estar cargado...y por mas "moderno" que sea el diseño...si yo tengo que elegir entre los 2....por todos los datos me quedo con el FN SCAR , otro dato...el M-16A2 esta en el peso de 3.77kg vacio y 4.47kg cargado..., el numero de 3.77kg que se decia en otro post implica que el FAL Para tiene el mismo peso del M-16 SCAR-L and SCAR-H use similar upper receivers that differ only in the size of ejection port. Other different parts include caliber-specific bolt, barrel, and lower receiver with integral magazine housing. Parts commonality between SCAR-L and SCAR-H is astonishing 90%. Barrels are quick-detachable, and held in the upper receiver with two cross-bolts. Barrel change procedure requires minimum amount of tools, takes just several minutes and there is no need to adjust the headspace after the change. The trigger unit with ambidextrous safety-fire mode selector switch allows for single shots and full automatic fire, with no provisions for limited-length bursts mode. The charging handle could be easily installed on either side of the weapon, so the upper receiver has respective cuts on both sides. Top of the upper receiver is covered by the full-length integral Picatinny rail (MIL-STD 1913); additional Picatinny rails are mounted on both sides and under the free-floating handguards. Side-folding polymer buttstock is adjustable for length of pull, and is shaped to proved positive cheek rest with adjustable cheek support. SCAR rifles are fitted with removable, adjustable iron sights, with folding diopter-type rear sight on the receiver rail, and folding front sight on the gas block. Any additional type of sighting equipment, necessary for current tasks, including telescope and night sights, can be installed using MIL-STD 1913 compatible mounts. por ahora....son todos los datos que tengo a mano , asi que esta en uds analizar saludos [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
Libertador de Argentina
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Terrestres
Futuro de las Fuerzas Terrestres
El mejor Fusil para el EA
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba