Responder al tema

Mensaje: <blockquote data-quote="HernanSCL" data-source="post: 2792330" data-attributes="member: 31027">Es bien grandeType: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphibious_transport_dock">Amphibious transport dock</a>Displacement:25,000 tons full load.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-cssc.net.cn-5">[5]</a>Length:210 m (689 ft 0 in)<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-cssc.net.cn-5">[5]</a>Beam:28 m (91 ft 10 in)<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-cssc.net.cn-5">[5]</a>Draft:7 m (23 ft 0 in)<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-cssc.net.cn-5">[5]</a>Speed:25 <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knot_(unit)">knots</a> (46 km/h; 29 mph)<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-cssc.net.cn-5">[5]</a>Range:10,000 <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nautical_mile">nmi</a> (19,000 km) at 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph)<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-cssc.net.cn-5">[5]</a>Boats & landing craft carried:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">4 × <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_726_LCAC">Type 726 Yuyi class LCAC</a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-Tate_2017-06-16-1">[1]</a></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_craft">Landing craft</a> on port/starboard davits<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-Tate_2017-06-16-1">[1]</a></li> </ul>Capacity:Vehicles<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-Tate_2017-06-16-1">[1]</a>Troops:600–800 troops<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-Tate_2017-06-16-1">[1]</a>Armament:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">1 × <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-176">AK-176</a> 76 mm (3.0 in) gun</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">4 × <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-630">AK-630</a> 30 mm (1.2 in) <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIWS">CIWS</a></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">4 × 18-tube Type 726-4 decoy/<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaff_(countermeasure)">chaff</a> launcher</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Possible installation of 2–4 <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_machine_gun">heavy machine guns</a> (Fitted <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_but_not_with">for but not with</a>)</li> </ul>Aircraft carried:4 <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C3%A9rospatiale_Super_Frelon">Z-8 Super Frelon</a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_071_amphibious_transport_dock#cite_note-Tate_2017-06-16-1">[1]</a>Its estimated production cost is USD 300 million. (wiki)En realidad una mera formalidad para cumplir con la ley de contrataciones, el contrato adjudicado el pasado 27 de diciembre a SIMA Perú por el BAP Paita asciende a 261 millones de soles, unos 81,10 millones de dólares. Las especificaciones contractuales se mantienen bajo reserva, aunque la Marina ha confirmado que ambos buques tendrán las mismas características y tecnologías.<a href="http://maquina-de-combate.com/blog/?p=55384">http://maquina-de-combate.com/blog/?p=55384</a>Veamos que tienen en la reserva activa:NDRF Archive<img src="https://www.maritime.dot.gov/sites/marad.dot.gov/files/oictures/JRRF_banner_3_0.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />The NDRF fleet can change from month-to-month depending on national defense needs, international relations, advances in technology, and cooperative efforts amongst U.S. Federal agencies. To gain an understanding of how it can fluxuate, see the links below, each listing the full NDRF vessel list for the repsective month.A mayo de 2020:<a href="https://www.maritime.dot.gov/sites/marad.dot.gov/files/pictures/i200430_1.pdf">https://www.maritime.dot.gov/sites/marad.dot.gov/files/pictures/i200430_1.pdf</a>En la lista ya no hay OHP ...Lo único que saldrá de USA... es un par de clase Independence (los dos primeros) y un par de clase Fredoom (los dos primeros)US Navy proposes decommissioning first 4 LCS more than a decade earlyBy: <a href="https://www.defensenews.com/author/david-b-larter">David B. Larter</a> December 24, 201917.7K229<img src="https://www.armytimes.com/resizer/VO-3Kh7IokSHZuwHX9K8ZmVoe4s=/1200x0/filters:quality(100)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/H7K5MWYR6ZDRTJAD4U2A7KLVQE.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />The U.S. Navy littoral combat ships Independence, left, and Coronado are shown underway in the Pacific Ocean. Both ships are slated to decommission in 2021 under a money-saving proposal. (MCC Keith DeVinney/U.S. Navy)ELMER, N.J. — The U.S. Navy has put forward a proposal to decommission the first four <a href="https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2019/12/19/congress-slashes-funding-for-the-navys-lcs-sensors-again/">littoral combat ships</a> in 2021 as part of a cost-savings measure, according to a <a href="https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2019/12/24/white-house-poised-to-blow-up-us-navys-plans-to-recapitalize-its-aging-sealift-ships/">memorandum from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget to the Defense Department</a>.The memo obtained by Defense News outlines plans to decommission the littoral combat ships Freedom, Independence, Fort Worth and Coronado, part of an overall plan to shrink the size of the force to deal with a flat budget. The ships all have between 12 and 17 years of planned hull life remaining.<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0a/USS-Freedom-130222-N-DR144-174-crop.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />The memo also outlines plans to decommission three dock landing ships — Whidbey Island, Germantown and Gunston Hall — between eight and 14 years early, as well as accelerating the decommissioning of four cruisers.<a href="https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2019/12/24/pentagon-proposes-big-cuts-to-us-navy-destroyer-construction-retiring-13-cruisers/">Pentagon proposes cuts to US Navy destroyer construction, retiring 13 cruisers</a>A Pentagon proposal sent to the White House would cut five destroyers out of the budget over the next five years. By: David Larter In the same document, the Department of Defense outlined plans to slash construction of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, cutting five out of 12 of the Burkes planned over the five-year Future Years Defense Program.The memo amounts to a back-and-forth between the DoD and OMB on areas of disagreement inside the Pentagon’s 2021 budget request, which has yet to be finalized. Bloomberg News and Breaking Defense previously reported on aspects of the memo.The plan, which an administration source told Defense News was driven by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, was not greeted warmly by OMB, which directed the DoD to come back with a plan that would get the Navy to 355 ships as per the original program.The Pentagon’s plan shrinks the size of the fleet from today’s fleet of 293 ships to 287 ships. The 355-ship goal was also made national policy in the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act.<img src="https://www.armytimes.com/resizer/A4KZmLwrWYxxueuqhP8dTPG7pe4=/600x0/filters:quality(100)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/2NJJIUX2YVBGTFTF5Y4FLLURE4.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />Marines approach the amphibious dock landing ship Germantown near Camp Schwab, Okinawa, in July. Germantown is now on the chopping block to decommission early. (Lance Cpl. Hannah Hall/U.S. Marine Corps)Decommissioning the ships will send the Navy back to the drawing board on how to get the new modules tested.Bryan McGrath, a retired destroyer captain and analyst with defense consultancy The Ferrybridge Group, said the plan to reduce the size of the fleet is a sign that the Defense Department isn’t willing to put the resources required toward growing the fleet.“If what you are reporting is true, this is a sign of the tension between the grand desires for a much larger fleet and the modest resources being applied to the problem,” McGrath said. “There simply is no way to grow the fleet as it is currently architected while maintaining the current fleet at a high state of readiness with the given resources."McGrath said if 355 is still the goal, the Pentagon has to either dramatically restructure the fleet to switch out large surface combatants such as cruisers and destroyers with smaller, less expensive ships, or it has to change what’s counted as a ship — both moves that have been signaled by the Navy in recent years.“This is why it’s so hard to grow a Navy,” McGrath said. “You have to decide it’s a national priority, you have to devote a lot of resources and you have to do it over a period of years. None of that has happened.”<a href="https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2019/12/24/us-navy-proposes-decommissioning-first-4-lcs-more-than-a-decade-early/">https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2019/12/24/us-navy-proposes-decommissioning-first-4-lcs-more-than-a-decade-early/</a>En resumen:No hay más OHP en la reserva activa.Para el próximo añoHay 2 Independence: el Independence LCS-2 y el LCS-4 Coronado.Hay 2 Freedom: el Freedom LCS-1 y alguno más.Y habrá un LPD, el Germantown LSD-42.Saludos</blockquote>

Verificación: Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982