Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Navales
Noticias y Actualidad de las Fuerzas Navales
Noticias de la Marina del Reino Unido
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="Hoot" data-source="post: 286783" data-attributes="member: 524"><p>Esta es la data que manejo:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/france-steaming-ahead-on-pa2cvf-carrier-project-01621/">http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/france-steaming-ahead-on-pa2cvf-carrier-project-01621/</a></p><p></p><p>France Steaming Ahead on PA2/CVF Carrier Project</p><p>09-Mar-2007 08:02 | Permanent Link</p><p>Related stories: Contracts - Awards, Surface Ships - Combat, R&D - Contracted, BAE, Thales, Other Corporation, Britain/U.K., Europe - France, Project Failures</p><p>SHIP_CV_PA2_Concept_2006-06.jpg</p><p>PA2 Concept, June 2006</p><p></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_CV_PA2_Concept_2006-06_lg.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Throughout most of the Cold War period, France maintained two aircraft carriers. That changed when the FNS Foch, the last Clemenceau Class carrier, was retired in November 2000 (it will now serve the Brazilian Navy as the Sao Paolo). As Strategis notes, France has lacked the capacity to ensure long-distance air coverage during the FNS Charles de Gaulle's maintenance cycles or during other periods when the carrier is not available for active duty (approximately 35% of the time). In 2015, the ship will be taken out of service for an extensive maintenance overhaul. Despite a slippage in initial construction dates from 2005 to 2007-2008, the French still hope to take delivery by 2014 so the the new ship can be operational by the time their sole operational aircraft carrier goes off line for repairs.</p><p></p><p>The project has been awarded to the "MPOA2" (Maitrise d'Oeuvre Porte Avions No 2) consortium composed of DCN and Thales, and is now proceeding in cooperation with the UK. <strong>The design was originally though to be for a ship of about 58,000t, <u>but detailed design work has pushed it up into the 74,000t range, fully 72% larger than the FNS Charles de Gaulle. Unlike the problematic nuclear-powered de Gaulle, however, the PA2 will be a conventionally-powered ship with an all-electric power system driven by Rolls Royce gas turbines.</u></strong></p><p></p><p>DID has updated this feature with additional information regarding the PA2's design and ongoing developments, plus some photos from DCN…</p><p></p><p>...In June 2006, PA2 ship design recommendations were made made to the French DGA. <strong>They included substantial changes: increasing displacement over the CVF design by 9,000t (to 74,000t)</strong>, maximum flight deck width by 4 m (to 73 m), and draft by 2 m (to 11.5 m). These increases stem from the need to incorporate American-designed 90 meter C13-2 steam catapults and accompanying boilers that are missing from the British design, internal hangar space changes, a significant increase in carried fuel, and nuclear weapons storage. These changes would also reduce speed from 26.3 knots to about 25-26 knots, a disappointment as the Marine Nationale was hoping for an increase to 29 knots.</p><p></p><p>Aviation Week reports that the extent of the modifications alarmed the British, to the extent that the joint program was called into question. By Sept. 21, 2006, however, it was accepted that the French PA2 would be only 90% compatible, and that both sides were willing to offer maximum cooperation. Though some features like the engine room and controls will be identical on both classes, the pressing need to cooperate has entailed concessions on both sides, and some key design differences:</p><p></p><p> * The PA2 must be fitted with steam catapults and arresting gear for the Rafale M fighters, plus the necessary piping, maintenance shafts, and boilers. The French are working to get US export clearance for the C13-2 system. Britain's F-35B STOVL Joint Strike Fighters will use a ramp for take off and can land vertically. The CVF Queen Elizabeth Class will be retrofittable for catapults, but the British prefer to wait for smaller, lighter EMALS electro-magnetic catapults rather than installing all that bulky, heavy, steam machinery.</p><p></p><p> * PA2's elevators from the aircraft hangar up to the flight deck will be slightly wider to accommodate the Rafale-M's wingspan. There may also be some hangar space changes.</p><p></p><p> * PA2 will embark 300 more sailors (1,720) than the CVF Queen Elizabeth Class.</p><p></p><p> * PA2 will have secure storage spaces for nuclear weapons. The Royal Navy delivers nuclear weapons only from its SSBN Vanguard Class Trident missile submarines.</p><p></p><p><strong> * PA2 will have more space for fuel, because the French navy refuels less often.</strong></p><p></p><p> * PA2 will use the same French SATRAP list compensation system used on the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, which use a combination of fins, rudders, and compensation weights on train tracks. SATRAP can maintain stabilization to within 0.5 degrees of horizontal, allowing aircraft launch and recovery up to Sea State 5/6...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Saludos.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hoot, post: 286783, member: 524"] Esta es la data que manejo: [url]http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/france-steaming-ahead-on-pa2cvf-carrier-project-01621/[/url] France Steaming Ahead on PA2/CVF Carrier Project 09-Mar-2007 08:02 | Permanent Link Related stories: Contracts - Awards, Surface Ships - Combat, R&D - Contracted, BAE, Thales, Other Corporation, Britain/U.K., Europe - France, Project Failures SHIP_CV_PA2_Concept_2006-06.jpg PA2 Concept, June 2006 [CENTER][IMG]http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_CV_PA2_Concept_2006-06_lg.jpg[/IMG][/CENTER] Throughout most of the Cold War period, France maintained two aircraft carriers. That changed when the FNS Foch, the last Clemenceau Class carrier, was retired in November 2000 (it will now serve the Brazilian Navy as the Sao Paolo). As Strategis notes, France has lacked the capacity to ensure long-distance air coverage during the FNS Charles de Gaulle's maintenance cycles or during other periods when the carrier is not available for active duty (approximately 35% of the time). In 2015, the ship will be taken out of service for an extensive maintenance overhaul. Despite a slippage in initial construction dates from 2005 to 2007-2008, the French still hope to take delivery by 2014 so the the new ship can be operational by the time their sole operational aircraft carrier goes off line for repairs. The project has been awarded to the "MPOA2" (Maitrise d'Oeuvre Porte Avions No 2) consortium composed of DCN and Thales, and is now proceeding in cooperation with the UK. [b]The design was originally though to be for a ship of about 58,000t, [u]but detailed design work has pushed it up into the 74,000t range, fully 72% larger than the FNS Charles de Gaulle. Unlike the problematic nuclear-powered de Gaulle, however, the PA2 will be a conventionally-powered ship with an all-electric power system driven by Rolls Royce gas turbines.[/u][/b] DID has updated this feature with additional information regarding the PA2's design and ongoing developments, plus some photos from DCN… ...In June 2006, PA2 ship design recommendations were made made to the French DGA. [b]They included substantial changes: increasing displacement over the CVF design by 9,000t (to 74,000t)[/b], maximum flight deck width by 4 m (to 73 m), and draft by 2 m (to 11.5 m). These increases stem from the need to incorporate American-designed 90 meter C13-2 steam catapults and accompanying boilers that are missing from the British design, internal hangar space changes, a significant increase in carried fuel, and nuclear weapons storage. These changes would also reduce speed from 26.3 knots to about 25-26 knots, a disappointment as the Marine Nationale was hoping for an increase to 29 knots. Aviation Week reports that the extent of the modifications alarmed the British, to the extent that the joint program was called into question. By Sept. 21, 2006, however, it was accepted that the French PA2 would be only 90% compatible, and that both sides were willing to offer maximum cooperation. Though some features like the engine room and controls will be identical on both classes, the pressing need to cooperate has entailed concessions on both sides, and some key design differences: * The PA2 must be fitted with steam catapults and arresting gear for the Rafale M fighters, plus the necessary piping, maintenance shafts, and boilers. The French are working to get US export clearance for the C13-2 system. Britain's F-35B STOVL Joint Strike Fighters will use a ramp for take off and can land vertically. The CVF Queen Elizabeth Class will be retrofittable for catapults, but the British prefer to wait for smaller, lighter EMALS electro-magnetic catapults rather than installing all that bulky, heavy, steam machinery. * PA2's elevators from the aircraft hangar up to the flight deck will be slightly wider to accommodate the Rafale-M's wingspan. There may also be some hangar space changes. * PA2 will embark 300 more sailors (1,720) than the CVF Queen Elizabeth Class. * PA2 will have secure storage spaces for nuclear weapons. The Royal Navy delivers nuclear weapons only from its SSBN Vanguard Class Trident missile submarines. [b] * PA2 will have more space for fuel, because the French navy refuels less often.[/b] * PA2 will use the same French SATRAP list compensation system used on the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, which use a combination of fins, rudders, and compensation weights on train tracks. SATRAP can maintain stabilization to within 0.5 degrees of horizontal, allowing aircraft launch and recovery up to Sea State 5/6... Saludos. [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Navales
Noticias y Actualidad de las Fuerzas Navales
Noticias de la Marina del Reino Unido
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba