Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Area Militar General
Temas de Defensa General
Reino Unido - Recorte de Presupuesto
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="MortCinder" data-source="post: 930381" data-attributes="member: 12307"><p>Esto es parte de una nota que publicó Defense Tech el viernes:</p><p></p><p>Me da mucha fiaca traducir todo, por eso lo resumo: Según Defense News (citada por Defense Tech), el almirantazgo está tratando de aprovecharse del accionar del Charles De Gaulle en el conflicto libio para justificar el mantenimiento de una flota de PA.</p><p>No se iban a quedar tranquilos dando de baja buques...</p><p>:sifone:</p><p></p><p>British military officials have developed a case of carrier envy, in the wake of France’s aircraft carrier Charles De Gaul taking a starring role in the operations to unseat Libya. As to be expected, the chief of the Royal Navy, First Sea Lord Adm. Sir Mark Stanhope, told British lawmakers how much the Royal Navy misses having an aircraft carrier:</p><p></p><p>From Defense News:</p><p></p><p>First Sea Lord Adm. Sir Mark Stanhope told the parliamentary defense committee that if Britain still had a carrier available, it would be deployed off the coast of Libya helping to enforce U.N. Resolution 1973.</p><p></p><p>Giving evidence alongside the heads of the Army and Air Force on the impact of last year’s defense review, Stanhope said that retaining HMS Ark Royal and its fleet of Harrier strike aircraft would have been his top priority if the government’s strategic defense review and associated four-year defense spending plan could be revisited.</p><p></p><p>As Stanhope went on to say, the Royal Navy is now faced with the task of rebuilding a fixed wing carrier strike force using the F-35C Joint Strike Fighter, a plane Britain isn’t expected to receive in serious numbers until the latter half of the decade. Those planes are slated to fly off the Queen Elizabeth class supercarriers that are slated to enter service around 2020.</p><p></p><p>The Royal Navy will then have to relearn catapult and arrestor gear carrier ops for the first time in nearly half a century (it used STOVL carriers from 1970s to 2011). Have fun with that. Yes, British JSF pilots will train on F-35Cs here in the states but still, rebuilding the ability to operate a jet-capable carrier air wing is going to take a little while.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nota completa: <a href="http://defensetech.org/#ixzz1MXjqjxrW">http://defensetech.org/#ixzz1MXjqjxrW</a> </p><p>Defense.org</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MortCinder, post: 930381, member: 12307"] Esto es parte de una nota que publicó Defense Tech el viernes: Me da mucha fiaca traducir todo, por eso lo resumo: Según Defense News (citada por Defense Tech), el almirantazgo está tratando de aprovecharse del accionar del Charles De Gaulle en el conflicto libio para justificar el mantenimiento de una flota de PA. No se iban a quedar tranquilos dando de baja buques... :sifone: British military officials have developed a case of carrier envy, in the wake of France’s aircraft carrier Charles De Gaul taking a starring role in the operations to unseat Libya. As to be expected, the chief of the Royal Navy, First Sea Lord Adm. Sir Mark Stanhope, told British lawmakers how much the Royal Navy misses having an aircraft carrier: From Defense News: First Sea Lord Adm. Sir Mark Stanhope told the parliamentary defense committee that if Britain still had a carrier available, it would be deployed off the coast of Libya helping to enforce U.N. Resolution 1973. Giving evidence alongside the heads of the Army and Air Force on the impact of last year’s defense review, Stanhope said that retaining HMS Ark Royal and its fleet of Harrier strike aircraft would have been his top priority if the government’s strategic defense review and associated four-year defense spending plan could be revisited. As Stanhope went on to say, the Royal Navy is now faced with the task of rebuilding a fixed wing carrier strike force using the F-35C Joint Strike Fighter, a plane Britain isn’t expected to receive in serious numbers until the latter half of the decade. Those planes are slated to fly off the Queen Elizabeth class supercarriers that are slated to enter service around 2020. The Royal Navy will then have to relearn catapult and arrestor gear carrier ops for the first time in nearly half a century (it used STOVL carriers from 1970s to 2011). Have fun with that. Yes, British JSF pilots will train on F-35Cs here in the states but still, rebuilding the ability to operate a jet-capable carrier air wing is going to take a little while. Nota completa: [url]http://defensetech.org/#ixzz1MXjqjxrW[/url] Defense.org [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
Libertador de Argentina
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Area Militar General
Temas de Defensa General
Reino Unido - Recorte de Presupuesto
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba