Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="Independiente17" data-source="post: 3757" data-attributes="member: 177">CONVENTIONAL v NUCLEAR BUNKER BUSTERSConventional (1)US conventional earth penetrating weapons (EPW) the GBU-28 and GBU-37 can break through 6m of reinforced concrete or 30m of earthGuided by laser or GPS they may also carry a 'smart fuse' which detonates the weapon at a pre-programmed pointInsufficient penetration for use against &quot;hardened and deeply buried targets&quot;Nuclear (2)A nuclear EPW such as the B61-11 can only penetrate 2-3m but even a shallow underground nuclear explosion produces an intense and damaging seismic shockDepending on the rock type, this could potentially crush a bunker at about 70 metres depthBut the missiles cannot penetrate deeply enough for the radioactive fallout to be contained<img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41545000/gif/_41545496_bunker_buster_416.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Independiente17, post: 3757, member: 177"] [B][U][CENTER]CONVENTIONAL v NUCLEAR BUNKER BUSTERS[/CENTER][/U][/B] Conventional (1) US conventional earth penetrating weapons (EPW) the GBU-28 and GBU-37 can break through 6m of reinforced concrete or 30m of earth Guided by laser or GPS they may also carry a 'smart fuse' which detonates the weapon at a pre-programmed point Insufficient penetration for use against "hardened and deeply buried targets" Nuclear (2) A nuclear EPW such as the B61-11 can only penetrate 2-3m but even a shallow underground nuclear explosion produces an intense and damaging seismic shock Depending on the rock type, this could potentially crush a bunker at about 70 metres depth But the missiles cannot penetrate deeply enough for the radioactive fallout to be contained [IMG]http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41545000/gif/_41545496_bunker_buster_416.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verificación

Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982