Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="SuperEtendard" data-source="post: 1743503" data-attributes="member: 128">Espero que esto satisfaga tu curiosidad! <img src="/foros/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" data-shortname=":D" />&quot;As far as the M2000 vs F-16 comparison is concerned I should add something totally practical which comes from daily usage of both types in HAF. What I want to say is generally that when a HAF M2000 wants to engage a Viper, it leads the Viper at low altitud where the M2000 cannot be beaten in anyway. I haven't seen yet any aircraft - apart from SU-27 family, which is, for me, the best aircraft ever built - that can achieve &quot;Kill Hour&quot; on a M2000 below 6-7.000 ft no matter the aspect between them. Ok?A good pilot in an M2K will kill a good pilot in an F-16, 9 out of 10 times (1 provided for launch failure).I served in the 331 squadron in HAF. We analyzed tactics and combat scores againts HAF F-16 squadrons all the time.The M2K HIGHER ITR gives it an advantage during the firts pass. The F-16 cannot outturn the Mirage. It has to climb in hopes of avoiding the look. A good M2K pilot will end it right there (the Magic 2 is a better IR weapon than the AIM-9L/M).A rookie in the M2K, however, will probably lose the F-16's climb. The more powerful Viper will escape and will then gain the advantage because of 1) altitude 2) HIGHER STR.As for turn rates, altitude diferences are purely theoretical and in practice make no difference EXCEPT for sea level manuevers where the more powerful Viper starts gaining the advantages.&quot;SaludosEnviado desde mi GT-I5500L usando Tapatalk 2</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SuperEtendard, post: 1743503, member: 128"] Espero que esto satisfaga tu curiosidad! :D "As far as the M2000 vs F-16 comparison is concerned I should add something totally practical which comes from daily usage of both types in HAF. What I want to say is generally that when a HAF M2000 wants to engage a Viper, it leads the Viper at low altitud where the M2000 cannot be beaten in anyway. I haven't seen yet any aircraft - apart from SU-27 family, which is, for me, the best aircraft ever built - that can achieve "Kill Hour" on a M2000 below 6-7.000 ft no matter the aspect between them. Ok? A good pilot in an M2K will kill a good pilot in an F-16, 9 out of 10 times (1 provided for launch failure). I served in the 331 squadron in HAF. We analyzed tactics and combat scores againts HAF F-16 squadrons all the time. The M2K HIGHER ITR gives it an advantage during the firts pass. The F-16 cannot outturn the Mirage. It has to climb in hopes of avoiding the look. A good M2K pilot will end it right there (the Magic 2 is a better IR weapon than the AIM-9L/M). A rookie in the M2K, however, will probably lose the F-16's climb. The more powerful Viper will escape and will then gain the advantage because of 1) altitude 2) HIGHER STR. As for turn rates, altitude diferences are purely theoretical and in practice make no difference EXCEPT for sea level manuevers where the more powerful Viper starts gaining the advantages." Saludos Enviado desde mi GT-I5500L usando Tapatalk 2 [/QUOTE]

Verificación

¿Cuanto es 2 mas 6? (en letras)