Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="Grulla" data-source="post: 2186433" data-attributes="member: 5064">El equivocado me parece que sos vos:1er - Usemos el criterio, en la era Trump porque van a gastar plata en convertir al T-50 en un F-16 si ya tienen al F-16, porque van a ponerse en gastar plata para convertir a un producto Coreano en un caza monoplaza que salga a disputar mercados, por mas participación que tenga Lockheed.2do - Leamos la nota completa en lugar de quedarnos con el titulo y elucubrar sinsentidos:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;chief Gen David Goldfein&nbsp; aid the USAF would run an experiment in the spring assessing off-the-shelf options to fill a low-end fighter role.&quot;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;The experiment would continue a previous US Special Operations Command effort known as Combat Dragon II, which demonstrated whether the Vietnam-era OV-10 Bronco could be fielded in counter-insurgency operations over Afghanistan.&quot;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;Goldfein’s vision for light-attack appears to target a new, existing aircraft.&quot;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;In the age of Trump, Paramount or Embraer, as foreign companies, could face an uphill battle. That leaves the floor open to existing options from American companies, including IOMAX. US-based Textron AirLand's Scorpion, which was not entered in the USAF’s T-X trainer programme, could find new life as a low-cost attack airplane.&quot;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &quot;Scorpion is one of several aircraft the USAF will examine during an experiment slated for this spring that will consider low-cost fighter options, Goldfein said last month.&quot;La nota es clara, aviones nuevos ya existentes, incluso nombra los candidatos probables (Scorpion, AT-6, AT-29, MWari, Thrush Aircraft S2R-T660)....ningún delirio de gastar dinero en el desarrollo de una nueva variante del T-50 inyectada de esteroides</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Grulla, post: 2186433, member: 5064"] El equivocado me parece que sos vos: 1er - Usemos el criterio, en la era Trump porque van a gastar plata en convertir al T-50 en un F-16 si ya tienen al F-16, porque van a ponerse en gastar plata para convertir a un producto Coreano en un caza monoplaza que salga a disputar mercados, por mas participación que tenga Lockheed. 2do - Leamos la nota completa en lugar de quedarnos con el titulo y elucubrar sinsentidos: "chief Gen David Goldfein aid the USAF would run an experiment in the spring assessing off-the-shelf options to fill a low-end fighter role." "The experiment would continue a previous US Special Operations Command effort known as Combat Dragon II, which demonstrated whether the Vietnam-era OV-10 Bronco could be fielded in counter-insurgency operations over Afghanistan." "Goldfein’s vision for light-attack appears to target a new, existing aircraft." "[B][U]In the age of Trump, Paramount or Embraer, as foreign companies, [/U][/B]could face an uphill battle. That leaves the floor open to existing options from American companies, including IOMAX. US-based Textron AirLand's Scorpion, which was not entered in the USAF’s T-X trainer programme, could find new life as a low-cost attack airplane." "Scorpion is one of several aircraft the USAF will examine during an experiment slated for this spring that will consider low-cost fighter options, Goldfein said last month." La nota es clara, aviones nuevos ya existentes, incluso nombra los candidatos probables (Scorpion, AT-6, AT-29, MWari, Thrush Aircraft S2R-T660)....ningún delirio de gastar dinero en el desarrollo de una nueva variante del T-50 inyectada de esteroides [/QUOTE]

Verificación

Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982