Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="me262" data-source="post: 3201976" data-attributes="member: 33946">Estimado, se vuelve a equivocar.Que le hayan hecho 1, 2 o 200 programas estructurales a las 500/1000/3000 o en el momento que a usted le guste más porque aparecieron fisuras, no invalida que su diseño original haya sido de 8 mil horas como lo dice Lockheed.Y eso de lo único que habla bien es del excelente servicio postventa del aparato, y del nivel del equipo de Ingeniería de General Dynamics primero, y de Lockheed después...No fundamenta su planteo...Versión oficial Lockheed Martin número 1:The U.S. Air Force authorized extending the service life of the Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) F-16's designed service life to 12,000 Equivalent Flight Hours — far beyond the aircraft's original design service life of 8,000 hours.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2017-04-12-U-S-Air-Force-Authorizes-Extended-Service-Life-for-F-16[/URL]Versión oficial Lockheed Martin número 2:The structural criteria established for the YF-16 enhanced performance/mission capabilities beyond previous fighter designs. The YF-16 design load factor was established at nine g at full internal fuel as opposed to the traditional requirement of 7.33 g at eighty percent internal fuel. The service life was established as 8,000 hours instead of the normal 4,000. Although a basic part of the design rationale centered on minimum avionics, the design team recognized that future needs would likely demand more capability than initially planned. Thus, the avionics/subsystem architecture was defined to accept progressive improvement and growth in capacity and volume.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=131[/URL]Code One, revista oficial de Lockheed Martin.Saludos.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="me262, post: 3201976, member: 33946"] Estimado, se vuelve a equivocar. Que le hayan hecho 1, 2 o 200 programas estructurales a las 500/1000/3000 o en el momento que a usted le guste más porque aparecieron fisuras, no invalida que su diseño original haya sido de 8 mil horas como lo dice Lockheed. Y eso de lo único que habla bien es del excelente servicio postventa del aparato, y del nivel del equipo de Ingeniería de General Dynamics primero, y de Lockheed después... No fundamenta su planteo... [B]Versión oficial Lockheed Martin número 1:[/B] The U.S. Air Force authorized extending the service life of the Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) F-16's designed service life to 12,000 Equivalent Flight Hours — far beyond the[B] aircraft's original design service life of 8,000 hours.[/B] [URL unfurl="true"]https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2017-04-12-U-S-Air-Force-Authorizes-Extended-Service-Life-for-F-16[/URL] [B]Versión oficial Lockheed Martin número 2:[/B] The [B]structural criteria[/B] established for the YF-16 enhanced performance/mission capabilities beyond previous fighter designs. The YF-16 design load factor was established at nine g at full internal fuel as opposed to the traditional requirement of 7.33 g at eighty percent internal fuel.[B] The service life was established as 8,000 hours[/B] instead of the normal 4,000. Although a basic part of the design rationale centered on minimum avionics, the design team recognized that future needs would likely demand more capability than initially planned. Thus, the avionics/subsystem architecture was defined to accept progressive improvement and growth in capacity and volume. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=131[/URL] Code One, revista oficial de Lockheed Martin. Saludos. [/QUOTE]

Verificación

Libertador de Argentina