Menú
Inicio
Visitar el Sitio Zona Militar
Foros
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Qué hay de nuevo
Nuevos mensajes
Última actividad
Miembros
Visitantes actuales
Entrar
Registrarse
Novedades
Buscar
Buscar
Buscar sólo en títulos
Por:
Nuevos mensajes
Buscar en los foros
Menú
Entrar
Registrarse
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Aéreas
Futuro de las Fuerzas Aéreas
Rumores y discusión sobre el próximo multirrol que no fue para la FAA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Estás usando un navegador obsoleto. No se pueden mostrar estos u otros sitios web correctamente.
Se debe actualizar o usar un
navegador alternativo
.
Responder al tema
Mensaje
<blockquote data-quote="Delfin" data-source="post: 75242" data-attributes="member: 2582"><p>Encontré esta data:</p><p><em>RCS </em></p><p>The base radar formula used is (RCS1/RCS2)^0.25. So the F-16C reduced RCS is 1.2 m2, standard fighter is 5 m2. (1.2/5)^0.25 = 0.69. Therefore the F-16C can be detected at 69% of radar range as compared with a standard fighter.</p><p></p><p><strong>B-52 Bomber</strong> 100 m2 bomber range x1</p><p><strong>F-4</strong>, <strong>A-10</strong> 25 m2 bomber x 0.71, fighter x 1.5</p><p><strong>B-1B Bomber</strong> 10 m2 bomber x 0.56, fighter x 1.19</p><p><strong>Tornado</strong> 8 m2 fighter x 1.12</p><p><strong>Generic fighter</strong> 5 m2 fighter range x 1</p><p><strong>MiG-21</strong> 3 m2 fighter x 0.88</p><p><strong>F-16C/18C</strong> w. reduced RCS 1.2 m2 fighter x 0.7</p><p><strong>F-18E</strong>, <strong>Rafale</strong> 0.75 m2 fighter x 0.62</p><p><strong>Eurofighter</strong> 0.25-0.75 m2 fighter x 0.47-0.62</p><p><strong>Exocet</strong>, <strong>Harpoon</strong> missile 0.1 m2 fighter x 0.38</p><p><strong>JSF</strong> (‘golf ball sized’) 0.005 m2 fighter x 0.18</p><p><strong>F-117, B-2, F-22</strong> 0.0001 m2 fighter x 0.07</p><p><strong>F-117, B-2 F-22</strong> also given as 0.01-0.001 m2, ‘marble sized’ or fighter x 0.12-0.21 </p><p></p><p>F-22 RCS requirement was 1/1000th the F-15. This has probably be exceeded by a large margin. Even if the F-15 RCS is a large 25 m2, the F-22 is 0.025 m2 worst case (fighter x 0.26). As can be seen ‘stealthy’ aircraft aim to reduce opposition situation awareness by decreasing detection range.</p><p></p><p>Fuente: Situation Awareness in Air Combat</p><p><a href="http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~dheb/2300/Articles/PG/PGSA.htm">http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~dheb/2300/Articles/PG/PGSA.htm</a></p><p></p><p>reconozco que no entendí bien los conceptos... :leaving:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Delfin, post: 75242, member: 2582"] Encontré esta data: [I]RCS [/I] The base radar formula used is (RCS1/RCS2)^0.25. So the F-16C reduced RCS is 1.2 m2, standard fighter is 5 m2. (1.2/5)^0.25 = 0.69. Therefore the F-16C can be detected at 69% of radar range as compared with a standard fighter. [B]B-52 Bomber[/B] 100 m2 bomber range x1 [B]F-4[/B], [B]A-10[/B] 25 m2 bomber x 0.71, fighter x 1.5 [B]B-1B Bomber[/B] 10 m2 bomber x 0.56, fighter x 1.19 [B]Tornado[/B] 8 m2 fighter x 1.12 [B]Generic fighter[/B] 5 m2 fighter range x 1 [B]MiG-21[/B] 3 m2 fighter x 0.88 [B]F-16C/18C[/B] w. reduced RCS 1.2 m2 fighter x 0.7 [B]F-18E[/B], [B]Rafale[/B] 0.75 m2 fighter x 0.62 [B]Eurofighter[/B] 0.25-0.75 m2 fighter x 0.47-0.62 [B]Exocet[/B], [B]Harpoon[/B] missile 0.1 m2 fighter x 0.38 [B]JSF[/B] (‘golf ball sized’) 0.005 m2 fighter x 0.18 [B]F-117, B-2, F-22[/B] 0.0001 m2 fighter x 0.07 [B]F-117, B-2 F-22[/B] also given as 0.01-0.001 m2, ‘marble sized’ or fighter x 0.12-0.21 F-22 RCS requirement was 1/1000th the F-15. This has probably be exceeded by a large margin. Even if the F-15 RCS is a large 25 m2, the F-22 is 0.025 m2 worst case (fighter x 0.26). As can be seen ‘stealthy’ aircraft aim to reduce opposition situation awareness by decreasing detection range. Fuente: Situation Awareness in Air Combat [URL]http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~dheb/2300/Articles/PG/PGSA.htm[/URL] reconozco que no entendí bien los conceptos... :leaving: [/QUOTE]
Insertar citas…
Verificación
Guerra desarrollada entre Argentina y el Reino Unido en 1982
Responder
Inicio
Foros
Fuerzas Aéreas
Futuro de las Fuerzas Aéreas
Rumores y discusión sobre el próximo multirrol que no fue para la FAA
Este sitio usa cookies. Para continuar usando este sitio, se debe aceptar nuestro uso de cookies.
Aceptar
Más información.…
Arriba