USAF altera criterios de pruebas para el KC-X, en detrimento de NG/EADS.

Estan que truenan!!, y es que no solo perdieron la plata, era como una cruzada patriotica casi lo que habia llevado adelante Boeing, y ni asi quedaron.
Fiejnse que en la pagina de Boeing inmediatamente detras del comunicado publicaron la entrega del segundo KC 767 a Japon.
 

MAC1966

Colaborador
Colaborador
Siguieron mi consejo.....:cool:

Jobs
* The KC-45A tanker will support more than 25,000 jobs in the United
States.

P.D-Nos leen.:eek:
 

MAC1966

Colaborador
Colaborador
Tambien dice:

La Northrop Grumman incluye partes cisterna construida en el Reino Unido, Alemania, España y Francia.

(Sobre el ARBS (Air Refuelling Boom System),EADS CASA es responsable del diseño, las pruebas, la producción y la certificación del ARBS)
 
Básicamente lo que dice es que el 767 de Boeing incluye partes construidas en Japón, Reino Unido, y otros países y que el KC45A, presenta los mismos porcentajes, vamos que no saben de que se quejan en Boeing.
 
Es el golpe al orgullo,además existen otros Joint Ventures Europeos-Estadounidenses que le brindan trabajo a la fuerza laboral "jonie",como AW-LM con el Kestrel,Bae,etc.
 
Como dicen en el barrio "se va a armar rosca..."

Boeing loses out in $40bn US deal

EADS and Northrop Grumman won the contract with their KC-30 aircraft
The owner of Airbus, EADS, and US firm Northrop Grumman have won a contract to build refuelling aircraft for the US Air Force, worth up to $40bn (£20bn).
The companies put in a joint bid to compete against Boeing for the lucrative deal to build 179 new aircraft over the next 10 to 15 years.

The winning plane will be assembled in Alabama. Parts including the wings will be built in the UK by Airbus.

The deal is a huge blow to Boeing, which had been widely expected to win.

The Pentagon contract is one of its largest in recent years.

The BBC's Adam Brookes in Washington says awarding such a massive deal to a consortium that includes overseas manufacturers will be contentious in the United States and it is likely that Boeing will appeal against the decision.

It is the first step in our critical commitment to recapitalise our ageing fleet to move, supply and position assets anywhere

Air Force Gen Duncan McNab

Boeing spokesman Jim Condelles said the company was disappointed. It will decide whether to appeal after hearing from the Air Force why it picked EADS, he said.

"We had two very competitive offers in this competition," Sue Payton, assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition said.

"Northrop Grumman clearly provided the best value to the government," she said.

Home-grown

Boeing had been emphasising its home-grown credentials while lobbying for the contract.


Boeing said it was disappointed its KC-767 design did not win

"The best for America's war fighters and America's workers," Boeing claimed in advertising running in the days leading up to the announcement.

But EADS and Northrop Grumman emphasised that the assembly work would be carried out in the United States, where the project would create or support 25,000 jobs.

"They don't come along at this scale very often," Northrop Grumman Chairman and CEO Ronald Sugar said.

The winners said their KC-30 plane had a "longer range", with the ability to carry 45,000 more pounds of fuel than it competitors.

"It is the first step in our critical commitment to recapitalise our ageing fleet to move, supply and position assets anywhere," said Air Force Gen Duncan McNab.

"In this global air force business, the critical element for air bridge, global intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and global strike is the tanker," he said.

The initial contract for the tanker, to be called the KC-45A, is to develop four test aircraft for $1.5bn, the US Air Force said.

"The KC-45A will provide significantly greater air refuelling capabilities than the current fleet of Eisenhower-era KC-135s it will begin replacing," the Air Force said in a statement.

The KC-45A will be able to refuel both Air Force and Navy aircraft on the same flight, which is not possible with the existing KC-135 Stratotankers.

It will also be able to refuel two aircraft simultaneously mid-flight and have defensive systems that will enable it to operate in the more dangerous environments that existing refuelling tankers have to avoid.

The Air Force expects the new aircraft to begin testing in 2010, before going into operation in 2013.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7272129.stm
 

pulqui

Colaborador
Hace unos días, Defencetalk levantó la noticia de que el nuevo tanquero de la USAF sería incapaz de reaprovisionar a los V-22 "Osprey". ¿ alguien tiene mas info ?


Defensetalk reprodujo la noticia que apareció en World Tankers Blog.
 

JQ01

Colaborador
Colaborador
Seguramente tan incapaz como lo pueda ser el 767. A los V-22 les dará de beber el mismo que da a los HH-53, los Hércules.
 
Arriba