Responder al tema

Mensaje

<blockquote data-quote="Nocturno Culto" data-source="post: 1155059" data-attributes="member: 6896">International law does not prohibit the use of napalm or other incendiaries against military targets,<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm#cite_note-UConn-14">[15]</a> but use against civilian populations was banned by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations">United Nations</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons">Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons</a> (CCW) in 1980.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm#cite_note-17">[18]</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty#Protocols">Protocol</a> III of the CCW restricts the use of all incendiary weapons, but a number of states have not acceded to all of the protocols of the CCW. According to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_International_Peace_Research_Institute">Stockholm International Peace Research Institute</a> (SIPRI), states are considered a party to the convention, which entered into force as international law in December 1983, if they ratify at least two of the five protocols. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States">United States</a>, for example, is a party to the CCW but did not sign protocol III.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm#cite_note-18">[19]</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nocturno Culto, post: 1155059, member: 6896"] [I]International law [U][B]does not prohibit the use of napalm or other incendiaries against military targets[/B][/U],[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm#cite_note-UConn-14'][15][/URL] [U][B]but use against civilian populations was banned by the [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations']United Nations[/URL] [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons']Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons[/URL] (CCW) in 1980.[/B][/U][URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm#cite_note-17'][18][/URL] [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty#Protocols']Protocol[/URL] III of the CCW restricts the use of all incendiary weapons, [U][B]but a number of states have not acceded to all of the protocols of the CCW[/B][/U]. According to the [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_International_Peace_Research_Institute']Stockholm International Peace Research Institute[/URL] (SIPRI), states are considered a party to the convention, which entered into force as international law in December 1983, if they ratify at least two of the five protocols. The [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States']United States[/URL], for example, is a party to the CCW but did not sign protocol III.[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm#cite_note-18'][19][/URL][/I] [/QUOTE]

Verificación

¿Cuanto es 2 mas 6? (en letras)