Los lios del F-35: ahora Israel... 200 palos por avión
- Tema iniciado Hattusil
- Fecha de inicio
Perfectirijillo
Colaborador
Ok, Mario gracias, en realidad no hay mucho que comparar, lo único que podrías comparar seria el costo total del ciclo de vida de la nave como para hacerse una idea.
Un abrazo.
Un abrazo.
Julian5000
Colaborador
Esto me llego de Jane's...
Norway opts for JSF over the Gripen
The Norwegian Ministry of Defence has selected the Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) to fulfil the country's Future Combat Aircraft (FCA) requirement, it was confirmed on 20 November. State Secretary for Defence Espen Barth Eide told Jane's that when tested against Norway's defined criteria - air defence; air-to-surface; air-interdict (strike); and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) - the JSF proved to be "clearly superior" to its competitor: the Saab JAS 39 Gripen NG
[first posted to http://jdw.janes.com - 21 November 2008]
¿Sabrán lo que les va a salir????
¡Pobre Gripen!!
Norway opts for JSF over the Gripen
The Norwegian Ministry of Defence has selected the Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) to fulfil the country's Future Combat Aircraft (FCA) requirement, it was confirmed on 20 November. State Secretary for Defence Espen Barth Eide told Jane's that when tested against Norway's defined criteria - air defence; air-to-surface; air-interdict (strike); and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) - the JSF proved to be "clearly superior" to its competitor: the Saab JAS 39 Gripen NG
[first posted to http://jdw.janes.com - 21 November 2008]
¿Sabrán lo que les va a salir????
¡Pobre Gripen!!
No estoy muy al tanto del tema, pero Israel adquirira tambien F-22??
Por su precio le saldria mejor el F-22, pero claramente el congreso de USA juega un papel mas activo alli...
Por su precio le saldria mejor el F-22, pero claramente el congreso de USA juega un papel mas activo alli...
Los requerimientos iniciales de la Hey'l Ha'avir son de 100 F-35 y 24 F-22 para comenzar a reemplazar los F-16 y los F-15...
No es mucho 100 f35 y 24 f22?, sera una fuerza aerea virtualmente imbatible frente a sus vecinos, aunque de todas formas lo es ahora.
Es increíble lo que tendran los israelies.
Es increíble lo que tendran los israelies.
!!y tiene menos poblacion que Uruguay y mucho menos territorio¡¡
Ese el solo las necesidades iniciales... Despues segurian por mas...
No te olvides que tiene 300 F-16 y mas de 100 F-15's... Sin contar los F-4 modernizados que aun vuelan...
Jejejejeje
Nació hace mas de 45 años y todavía vuela...
Y hay gatitos que quieren compararsele...
:biggrinjester:
Perdón el Off... no me pude contener... :hurray:
Pero si son los aviones mas modernos que vuelan...tan asi que no llevan piloto
:smilielol5::smilielol5::smilielol5:
Saludos
:smilielol5::smilielol5::smilielol5:
Yo tampoco....:biggrinjester:
Saludos
No solo vuela... :sifone: Todavia pega unas palizas de madre... :boxing_smiley:
Tienen al menos 30 Kurnass 2000 en segunda linea, para interdiccion... Los van a retirar para el 2010...
Saludos!
Boreal, se vuelan, por pilotos Sr. o instructores, como una reserva activa, en caso de necesidad tienen 30 bichos con radar El-2032, 8 Tn. de carga, y una linda suite de ECM... Por lo que se, seguiran volando hasta que los F-16I logren el IOC completo en 2010...
Abrazo!
paulo
Forista Sancionado o Expulsado
Saturday, November 29, 2008
F-35 development to cost $15 billion more
Inside the Air Force says developing the F-35 will take two years longer and cost $15 billion more than estimated.
The conclusion was made by an independent team of Pentagon cost analysts, however senior Pentagon leaders, at the direction of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, have elected to largely disregard the report for now and hope that the more optimistic projections of program managers and Lockheed officials can be met, the publication reported.
Development and testing costs for the F-35 joint strike fighter could soar dramatically higher than Defense Department officials expect, a defense trade publication reported Wednesday.
An independent team of Pentagon cost analysts has concluded that completing development and testing of the next-generation Lockheed Martin-built F-35 Lightning II will take two years longer and cost $15 billion more than estimated, according to the report by Inside the Air Force.
Senior Pentagon leaders, at the direction of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, have elected to largely disregard the report for now and hope that the more optimistic projections of program managers and Lockheed officials can be met, the publication reported.
The Pentagon will add $480 million to the F-35 testing budget for 2010 but is not planning to add development funds in future years.
Adding funds in 2010 "is extremely prudent," John Young, defense undersecretary for acquisition, told Inside the Air Force.
Young said Pentagon leaders, including England and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, were forced to choose between two widely divergent views of likely F-35 development progress and costs.
The independent team said it based its estimate on experience with other aircraft-development programs. The lower estimate was developed by the Pentagon’s in-house program managers.
Lockheed said in a statement that the internal Pentagon estimate "is overly conservative," based on progress and data so far.
"While some [development] budget challenges remain, we are confident that we will complete the program at a far lower cost than forecast" by the Pentagon cost estimators, the statement said.
If the development costs soar, it will force the Pentagon as part of the Obama administration to make a choice to delay production and shift money to development or to add funds, which would likely lead to cuts in other high-profile weapons programs.
Ajo que las encomendas de los paises del programa no seran tan grandes
F-35 development to cost $15 billion more
Inside the Air Force says developing the F-35 will take two years longer and cost $15 billion more than estimated.
The conclusion was made by an independent team of Pentagon cost analysts, however senior Pentagon leaders, at the direction of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, have elected to largely disregard the report for now and hope that the more optimistic projections of program managers and Lockheed officials can be met, the publication reported.
Development and testing costs for the F-35 joint strike fighter could soar dramatically higher than Defense Department officials expect, a defense trade publication reported Wednesday.
An independent team of Pentagon cost analysts has concluded that completing development and testing of the next-generation Lockheed Martin-built F-35 Lightning II will take two years longer and cost $15 billion more than estimated, according to the report by Inside the Air Force.
Senior Pentagon leaders, at the direction of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, have elected to largely disregard the report for now and hope that the more optimistic projections of program managers and Lockheed officials can be met, the publication reported.
The Pentagon will add $480 million to the F-35 testing budget for 2010 but is not planning to add development funds in future years.
Adding funds in 2010 "is extremely prudent," John Young, defense undersecretary for acquisition, told Inside the Air Force.
Young said Pentagon leaders, including England and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, were forced to choose between two widely divergent views of likely F-35 development progress and costs.
The independent team said it based its estimate on experience with other aircraft-development programs. The lower estimate was developed by the Pentagon’s in-house program managers.
Lockheed said in a statement that the internal Pentagon estimate "is overly conservative," based on progress and data so far.
"While some [development] budget challenges remain, we are confident that we will complete the program at a far lower cost than forecast" by the Pentagon cost estimators, the statement said.
If the development costs soar, it will force the Pentagon as part of the Obama administration to make a choice to delay production and shift money to development or to add funds, which would likely lead to cuts in other high-profile weapons programs.
Ajo que las encomendas de los paises del programa no seran tan grandes
Pero muchos mas enemigos y personitas genocidas que amenazan con borrarlos del mapa. :yonofui:
Si Uruguay estuviera en esa situación no tendría con que comprar esas Armas...
Israel tiene casi el doble de población que Uruguay Jedi.
Temas similares
