Air-to-air missile non-comparison table
Especially not range, for which the correct answer always is "it depends".
To take one example, the Vympel R-77 has a stated range of 100 km against a head-on target at high altitude, but only 25 km in a stern chase. At low altitude it can fire at head-on targets at 20 km, from which we can guess range in a stern chase is 5 km. 
(See the above diagram.)
And this is presumably against targets that don't try to evade.
Range varies similarily for AIM-7C.
Target and shooter both at M 0.9
altitude head on tail chase
50.000'/16km 14.000-37.000 feet/4.5-12km 8.200-25.000 feet/3-8km
30.000'/10km 9.500-34.000 feet/3-11km 4.200-20.000 feet/1.6-6km
sea level 9.500-19.000 feet/3-6.5km 2.000- 5.700 feet/0.6-1.9km
The improvements planned for, but at the time of writing (2000) cancelled, future versions of AMRAAM include the ability to engage 9G manouevring targets at 30 km, which will let it engage non-agile targets at more than 60 km, which gives a good idea of the range difference depending on type of target.
This is what the Swedish air force says are typical ranges for some missiles
Low altitude High altitude
Rb 24J Sidewinder about 1000 m slightly more than 3000 m (AIM-9P)
Rb 71 SkyFlash a couple of km well over 10 km
Rb 74 Sidewinder, AIM-9L
Can be fired at even shorter ranges and more extreme angles than
AIM-9J, as well as handle even more agile targets.
Not quite as impressive as some of the numbers usually given, but these are ranges usable in practice, most of the time.
. Mi intención es solo mostrar que, a lo menos en cuanto a precio, las estimaciones respecto al Derby estaban erradas, y en cuanto a alcance, también (antes se le daban como máximo 50 km, calificándolo de "Baby BVR" 
